Cancer Drug Shortages Disrupt Hospital Supply Chains, Raise Rationing Concerns

Shortages of several generic chemotherapy drugs are straining hospital supply chains and raising concerns that cancer centers may need to ration treatment for some patients, according to a June 24 New York Times report.

Manufacturing problems, shipping delays and decisions by some companies to stop producing the medications have contributed to shortages of carboplatin, cisplatin, oxaliplatin and ifosfamide — drugs that form the backbone of treatment for breast, lung, head and neck, ovarian, testicular and bladder cancers.

Hospitals and cancer clinics working with Premier, a company that negotiates discounts on drugs and supplies for about 4,200 health systems nationwide, have received only 38% of their ifosfamide orders and about two-thirds of their cisplatin orders, according to the report. Some providers have begun spacing out doses and scheduling patients consecutively to minimize drug waste, while others are prioritizing patients most likely to benefit from treatment. Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute told The Times securing supplies of carboplatin, cisplatin and oxaliplatin has been “very difficult.”

It is not the first time cisplatin and carboplatin have driven widespread rationing concerns — in 2023, more than 97% of hospitals surveyed said the carboplatin shortage was affecting patient care and pharmacy operations, triggered by quality failures at a single Indian manufacturer. As recently as November 2025, carboplatin and cisplatin were still identified as the most problematic shortages among 22 chemotherapy drugs in active short supply.

The FDA tracks all active shortages through its database and is considering temporarily allowing imports from manufacturers that do not typically supply the U.S. — a tool it previously deployed during the 2023 cisplatin crisis, when it authorized temporary importation from Chinese manufacturer Qilu Pharmaceutical.

The ifosfamide shortage traces to manufacturing problems at Simtra BioPharma Solutions, formerly Baxter Oncology GmbH, at its contract facility in Germany. The FDA issued Simtra a warning letter in March following a September 2025 inspection that found repeated microbial contamination in aseptic processing areas. The European Medicines Agency has separately warned that the facility is not expected to return to full capacity until early 2027.

 

Source Link

Recommended Articles

White House Adds Nine More Drugmakers To MFN Pricing Deal

The Trump administration on Monday announced that it has reached agreements with nine midsized pharmaceutical companies to offer most-favored nation (MFN) prices for prescription drugs to U.S. consumers. The agreements will provide every state Medicaid program access to MFN drug prices on products made by these companies. Alcon, Astellas Pharma, BeOne Medicines, BridgeBio, CSL, Kyowa Kirin, ...

Read More

UnitedHealthcare To End Prior Authorizations For About 1.7K Procedures

A health insurance giant is trying to show physicians and policymakers that it’s serious about reducing the impact of prior authorization reviews on providers and patients. UnitedHealth Group’s UnitedHealthcare unit has posted a list of procedure codes for about 1,700 procedures that will no longer be subject to routine prior authorization review requirements. The simpler items on ...

Read More

Scammers Are Stealing Agents’ Credentials To Commit ACA Fraud

An international crime ring helps Americans get licensed as insurance agents or brokers, then uses the new producers’ credentials to bilk health insurers and the federal government. Officials at the Iowa Division of Insurance put out a warning about the new enrollment fraud strategy Tuesday. The criminals start by contacting job hunters or other would-be insurance producers. ...

Read More

$50B Rural Health Transformation Program Needs More Transparency, Groups Say

One year into its creation, a $50 billion federal program aimed at improving rural healthcare lacks transparency, which could make it difficult to protect against fraud, identify successful projects, and ensure the program delivers on its promise to transform the system. Transparency “is really important to help protect the integrity of the program, ensure funds ...

Read More
arrowcaret-downclosefacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squarelinkedin-squarepauseplaytwitter-squareyoutube-square