21 States File Lawsuit Challenging 2027 ACA Payment Rule

A coalition of attorneys general from 21 states, along with Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, have filed a lawsuit challenging a federal rule that they allege undermines the Affordable Care Act and makes health insurance more expensive and harder to obtain for millions of Americans. The lawsuit seeks to block provisions of the Trump administration’s ACA payment rule for 2027 health plans, which the same attorneys general previously opposed in a March comment letter.

“The Trump administration’s policies have already caused over a million Americans to lose coverage,” New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport said. “New Jersey families are already reeling this year from the president’s refusal to extend ACA tax credits, his tariffs and his war. Now, instead of lowering health insurance costs, the Trump administration is reducing coverage and raising costs.”

Although a federal court vacated several provisions of the previous rule that were in question, the plaintiffs said the 2027 ACA rule reinstates a number of the elements that were blocked. The also said the regulation includes expansion of catastrophic health plans that goes beyond limits established in the law and allows catastrophic- and bronze-tier plans to circumvent the out-of-pocket maximums established by law. They also object to the way the changes were adopted “without adequate explanation or a meaningful response” to comments from the coalition, which would be considered “arbitrary and capricious” under the Administrative Procedure Act.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is part of the coalition.

“The Affordable Care Act was designed to make health care more affordable and accessible. But once again, this administration is moving in the wrong direction by adopting harmful provisions that push consumers into bare-bones plans and strip away critical protections,” he said. “We are returning to court to challenge these unlawful changes. At a time when families are already facing rising costs, they cannot afford to pay more for coverage that gives them less.”

Late last month, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service filed an appeal to overturn a Maryland judge’s decision to overturn part of the previous rule.

Joining Bonta, Davenport and Shapiro in the lawsuit are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.

 

Source Link 

Recommended Articles

White House Adds Nine More Drugmakers To MFN Pricing Deal

The Trump administration on Monday announced that it has reached agreements with nine midsized pharmaceutical companies to offer most-favored nation (MFN) prices for prescription drugs to U.S. consumers. The agreements will provide every state Medicaid program access to MFN drug prices on products made by these companies. Alcon, Astellas Pharma, BeOne Medicines, BridgeBio, CSL, Kyowa Kirin, ...

Read More

UnitedHealthcare To End Prior Authorizations For About 1.7K Procedures

A health insurance giant is trying to show physicians and policymakers that it’s serious about reducing the impact of prior authorization reviews on providers and patients. UnitedHealth Group’s UnitedHealthcare unit has posted a list of procedure codes for about 1,700 procedures that will no longer be subject to routine prior authorization review requirements. The simpler items on ...

Read More

Scammers Are Stealing Agents’ Credentials To Commit ACA Fraud

An international crime ring helps Americans get licensed as insurance agents or brokers, then uses the new producers’ credentials to bilk health insurers and the federal government. Officials at the Iowa Division of Insurance put out a warning about the new enrollment fraud strategy Tuesday. The criminals start by contacting job hunters or other would-be insurance producers. ...

Read More

$50B Rural Health Transformation Program Needs More Transparency, Groups Say

One year into its creation, a $50 billion federal program aimed at improving rural healthcare lacks transparency, which could make it difficult to protect against fraud, identify successful projects, and ensure the program delivers on its promise to transform the system. Transparency “is really important to help protect the integrity of the program, ensure funds ...

Read More
arrowcaret-downclosefacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squarelinkedin-squarepauseplaytwitter-squareyoutube-square