Pfizer Could Shift Overseas Production To U.S. If Trump’s Pharma Tariffs Take Hold, CEO Says

As biopharma players continue to parse out what the second Trump administration means for the industry, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, Ph.D., outlined one potential response by his company if pharmaceutical tariffs come into play.

Pfizer’s local manufacturing setup is already well positioned in the U.S., and the New York-based drugmaker could bring additional resources into the country if the situation demands, Bourla said Monday at TD Cowen’s 45th annual healthcare conference in Boston.

Bourla made his comment against a backdrop of uncertainty as pharma execs and industry watchers weigh the effects of potential tariffs from President Donald Trump’s administration.

Besides general tariffs on products from Canada, Mexico and China, Trump in late February said he planned to introduce tariffs starting at “25% or higher” on pharmaceutical imports, Reuters reported last month.

Trump did not provide a timeline for when the tariffs could set in for the pharma industry, though he acknowledged the importance of giving drugmakers time to set up domestic factories to avoid any potential penalties, according to the news service.

At the TD Cowen event Monday, Bourla admitted that the situation could be tricky for pharma companies, given the significant volumes of drugs—both generic and innovative—that are produced outside of the U.S.

Still, the CEO stressed that Pfizer is likely set up for success no matter what comes. Pfizer already has 13 U.S. manufacturing sites up and running, including several “megasites” for sterile injectables and antibody manufacturing, according to Bourla.

“We have all the capabilities here, and the manufacturing sites are operating in good capacity right now,” he continued. “But if something happens, we will try to mitigate by transferring from manufacturing sites outside to manufacturing sites here.”

Bourla—who’s long had a working relationship with Trump thanks to the Operation Warp Speed initiative in 2020—has taken an upbeat stance toward the new administration. Speaking at a forum held by the trade group PhRMA last month, the Pfizer chief suggested Trump’s second run in the White House presents more opportunities than risks for drugmakers.

Meanwhile, other pharma companies, such as Eli Lilly, appear to be wasting no time embracing domestic drug production.

Last week, the Indianapolis-based drugmaker said it would kick off construction this year on four new manufacturing plants in the U.S. for a total investment of $27 billion. The project, which is expected to create more than 3,000 jobs, will introduce three new drug ingredients plants in the U.S. plus a fourth for injectable therapeutics.

 

Source Link

Recommended Articles

Schumer Announces Health Care Plan

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer officially unveiled Democrats’ plan for a health care vote next week, saying Thursday on the chamber floor his caucus will propose extending soon-to-expire Affordable Care Act subsidies for three years. “This is the bill, a clean three-year extension of ACA tax credits, that Democrats will bring to the floor of ...

Read More

House Votes To Pass 5-Year Hospital At Home Extension, Sending Bill To The Senate

The House of Representatives unanimously voted to pass a bill Monday that extends the Medicare hospital at home program for five years. Hospital at home providers have been mired in uncertainty for years. Though Congress has repeatedly extended hospital at home flexibilities, it often only does so for a handful of months at a time. ...

Read More

Lobbyists Are Salivating For More Of Trump’s Drug Price Deals

Lobbyists for some of the world’s largest drug companies are parading a new pricing deal in the U.K. as a model the rest of Europe should emulate if it wants to keep drugmakers from bailing for America. To President Donald Trump and the lobbyists’ delight, British officials agreed to spend 25 percent more on new ...

Read More

Senate Barrels Toward Failure On Health Care

Senators have about a week before they’re set to vote on soon-to-expire Affordable Care Act subsidies. Most of them already believe the chances for a bipartisan breakthrough by then are roughly zero. There’s no clear momentum for any plan that would avoid a lapse in tax credits that could raise insurance premiums for 20 million ...

Read More
arrowcaret-downclosefacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squarelinkedin-squarepauseplaytwitter-squareyoutube-square