Top Insurance Official Warns of Coming ObamaCare Premium Hikes

A top executive at the trade group representing health insurers on Monday warned of premium increases for ObamaCare plans next year, saying the situation is “not a pretty picture right now.”

Matt Eyles, senior executive vice president of America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), said that insurers “want to make sure people have access to coverage at the most affordable price, but that also has to reflect what the reality is right now and it’s not a pretty picture right now.”

Eyles, who will become CEO of AHIP on June 1, blamed several policies advanced by Republicans in Congress or the administration for the problems.

Speaking at an event hosted by The Atlantic, he noted the repeal of the individual mandate in the tax bill in December, which is expected to lead to less healthy people signing up, as well as initiatives from the Trump administration to expand access to cheaper, skimpier plans known as short-term plans, which have also raised fears of siphoning away healthy people and causing an increase in premiums.

The premium increases are set to be announced in October, shortly before the midterm elections, and Democrats are hoping to capitalize and blame Republicans for the spikes.

Insurers have warned that premiums could increase by nearly 30 percent for ObamaCare plans, although many people receive subsidies that shield them from those increases. The hardest-hit are people who make too much income to qualify for subsidies.

“When you think about things like the individual mandate going away, some of the other proposed rules that are being put in place, whether it be around association plans, short-term policies, it’s just still a nasty soup right now that’s brewing and we’re looking ahead to 2019 and it’s not a really great picture right now,” he said. He noted that “a lot of companies are committed to the market” but indicated they might need to raise premiums to deal with the instability.

He lamented that Congress did not pass a bill aimed at stabilizing markets and lowering premiums in the omnibus government funding package that passed last month.

Lawmakers from both parties had worked for months on that bill, but it eventually fell apart in large part due to a dispute on whether to apply abortion restrictions to the new funding.

Eyles did not apply blame to one party or the other for the failure, but noted AHIP had pushed hard for a bill.

“We are concerned about 2019 and I think that was why we worked so hard up through the omnibus package and pushing as hard as we did,” Eyles said.

Source Link

Recommended Articles

New NFIB Survey: Small Businesses Report Reduced Optimism

The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell 0.6 points in May to 95.3, remaining below its 52-year average of 98.0. The Uncertainty Index rose 3 points from April to 91, remaining well above its historical average of 68. As reported in NFIB’s monthly Jobs Report, the NFIB Small Business Employment Index remained essentially flat, registering 100.3 in May. ...

Read More

Trump Announces TrumpRx Expansion, Adding 160 More Drugs

President Trump on Friday announced that over 100 prescription medications would be added to his administration’s direct-to-consumer drug platform, TrumpRx, the second expansion of the initiative in as many months. “I am pleased to announce that TrumpRx.gov is adding another 160 Prescription Drugs, at highly discounted prices, for a new total of over 800 of the most commonly-used Prescription Drugs,” ...

Read More

Skyrocketing GLP-1 Demand Creates Major Financial Strain For Employers

GLP-1 drugs are a double-edged sword for the nation’s employers. Although they are having a demonstrable effect on workplace health, the high cost is putting a strain on their budgets. GLP-1s, known by brand names such as Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro or Zepbound, originally were developed to help regulate blood sugar in people with Type 2 ...

Read More

Judge Throws Out Policy Imposing $100,000 Fees for Skilled Worker Visas

A Trump administration initiative to impose $100,000 fees on employers seeking visas for skilled foreign workers amounts to an unlawful tax on those companies and must be voided “in its entirety,” a federal judge ruled on Monday. The decision by Judge Leo T. Sorokin of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts nullified ...

Read More
arrowcaret-downclosefacebook-squarehamburgerinstagram-squarelinkedin-squarepauseplaytwitter-squareyoutube-square