Supreme Court Declines To Hear New ObamaCare Challenge

The Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear another challenge to ObamaCare.

This lawsuit, which was viewed as a long shot, claimed the law has violated the Constitution’s “Origination Clause,” which says that bills that raise revenue have to originate in the House.

The conservatives who filed the suit argued that ObamaCare’s individual mandate counts as a revenue-raising measure, because it brings in money from people paying fines but that the bill had effectively originated in the Senate, not the House.

A federal appeals court had rejected thechallenge, though, ruling that the Origination Clause did not affect ObamaCare because it was primarily about expanding health coverage, not raising revenue.

As is its custom, the Supreme Court gave no reasoning for deciding not to hear an appeal of this ruling, which would have required the votes of four justices.

Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) and 39 other Republican lawmakers had filed a brief in support of the challenge, called Sissel v. Department of Health and Human Services.

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of ObamaCare in 2012 and in 2015 upheld the law’s core subsidies against a challenge based on interpreting the text of the law.

Still, the court is not done with ObamaCare. It will hear a case later this year brought by nuns challenging the law’s contraceptive mandate.

Source Link

Recommended Articles

Lawmakers, Payers And Providers All Air Grievances With Federal No Surprises Act Implementation

Amid a flurry of partisan roadblocks rolling out across Capitol Hill, representatives on both sides of the aisle came together Tuesday to critique federal agencies’ rollout of the No Surprises Act and throw their support behind court-ordered rewrites of independent dispute resolution (IDR) regulations. During a hearing exploring the “flawed implementation” of the law intended ...

Read More

As Biden Plans To Ban Medical Debt From Credit Scores, Advocates Press For More Change

The dramatic impact of medical debt on credit scores may soon be a thing of the past. On Thursday, the White House announced a plan outlined by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to eliminate medical debt from credit reports. The move — which follows an earlier decision from the three main credit bureaus to eliminate paid medical debt, medical ...

Read More

Compliance With The CAA’s Gag Clause Prohibition

The Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) of 2021 made a number of federal changes to the U.S. health care system, with the goal of increasing transparency. One of the most immediate changes was the prohibition of gag clauses in contracts between insurance plans, insurance issuers, and providers. Gag clauses are contractual provisions that restrict plans or ...

Read More

Answers To Q4 Frequently Asked Questions

Throughout the year, especially during Q4, we know you are bound to have questions about Underwriting, Client Experience, Enrollment, and Compliance. That’s why we’ve compiled this list of the most frequently asked questions (FAQs) during peak season.

Read More