Health-Law Tax-Credit Payments to Insurers Questioned

The Obama administration wasn’t able to ensure that all tax-credit payments made to insurers under the health law in 2014 were on behalf of consumers who had paid their premiums, according to a federal oversight agency.

However, the agency noted the Obama administration this year is moving to a new automated system that should alleviate potential problems identified in its investigation. The Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General is scheduled to release the report Wednesday.

The findings raise questions about the oversight of tax-credit payments that went to insurers on behalf of consumers who qualified for financial assistance.

Tax credits are a major enticement to low- and moderate-income people who buy insurance on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act because they lower monthly premium costs. After consumers sign up for coverage, they can choose to have the federal government distribute the tax-credit payments to insurers to lower their premiums. Nearly $11 billion in tax credits were paid to insurers in fiscal 2014, according to a report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

The Obama administration said last year that about 85% of enrollees received the subsidy and got an average tax credit of $270 a month.

The inspector general found that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which oversees the health law, didn’t have an effective process in 2014 for ensuring that those tax-credit payments were accurately made only on behalf of enrollees—meaning the agency couldn’t verify the payments to insurers were only for consumers who had paid their premiums.

Instead, the agency relied on each insurer to provide aggregated information to determine the total amount in tax credits that should be paid to the insurance company. That meant “there is a risk that funds were authorized for payment” in incorrect amounts, according to the report.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services officials noted that the inspector general didn’t conclude that any overpayments were made to insurance companies.

“CMS has already addressed or is addressing the IG’s recommendations,” said Meaghan Smith, a spokeswoman for the agency. “Moreover, CMS is implementing a fully automated policy-based payment process beginning this month.”

Republicans critical of the health law have focused on the tax credits, saying inaccurate payments to consumers occurred—and are a sign that some federal funds were misspent. A July report by the Government Accountability Office found fictitious applicants on the federal exchange were able to fraudulently be approved for coverage and tax credits. A Health and Human Services inspector general report in August found that some consumers who got health coverage or subsidies on might not have been eligible to receive them in 2014 because of deficiencies in the federal exchange’s internal controls. Also in 2014, Republicans held congressional hearings on inaccurate subsidies.

Obama administration officials say they have implemented rigorous and effective internal controls to ensure accurate payments to insurers of tax credits.

Source Link

Recommended Articles

White House Leaves One Trump-Era Policy Alone

The Biden administration has gutted many of former President Donald Trump’s health care policies, but there’s one that the White House has yet to touch, Kelly reports. It’s a 2019 rule that expanded individual coverage health reimbursement arrangements, or ICHRAs, which allowed employers to provide tax-exempt subsidies to help workers purchase Obamacare plans. The Biden administration’s ...

Read More

Court Strikes Down HHS Rule that Allowed Insurers to Not Count Copay Assistance

In a major victory for patients who depend on prescription drugs, Judge John D. Bates of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia struck down a Trump administration federal rule that allowed health insurers to not count drug manufacturer copay assistance towards a beneficiary’s out-of-pocket costs. The case was brought against the U.S. Department of Health and ...

Read More

Lawmakers, Payers And Providers All Air Grievances With Federal No Surprises Act Implementation

Amid a flurry of partisan roadblocks rolling out across Capitol Hill, representatives on both sides of the aisle came together Tuesday to critique federal agencies’ rollout of the No Surprises Act and throw their support behind court-ordered rewrites of independent dispute resolution (IDR) regulations. During a hearing exploring the “flawed implementation” of the law intended ...

Read More

As Biden Plans To Ban Medical Debt From Credit Scores, Advocates Press For More Change

The dramatic impact of medical debt on credit scores may soon be a thing of the past. On Thursday, the White House announced a plan outlined by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to eliminate medical debt from credit reports. The move — which follows an earlier decision from the three main credit bureaus to eliminate paid medical debt, medical ...

Read More